"Developing countries, and the poorest people who live in them, are the most vulnerable to climate change. Yet it is also they who are most in need of expanded energy services to meet their growth and development needs. UNDP is working across the world to help developing countries build the capacity needed both to adapt to the impacts of climate change and dramatically expand the reach of affordable, improved energy services to the 2 billion people who currently go without. As global citizens we cannot afford to wait to address these urgent issues."
Climate change is a significant threat to poverty reduction efforts. The UNDP, in collaboration with other agencies, wrote and published this paper to "explore and summarize the current state of knowledge on adaptation to climate change and the need for its integration into poverty eradication and sustainable development efforts."
Recently, I heard that some experts believe that it is necessary for developing countries to continue burning through their supply of fossil fuels, that it is unfair to ask poor countries to adopt practices that slow climate change because these are expensive, both financially and in terms of infrastructure. So should developing countries be "encouraged" by the rest of the world adopt these practices? Are they entitled to financial aid from the international community? Is climate change even a legitimate focus while we're working on reducing poverty, or vice versa?
The only thing that seems clear to me is that this debate is knotty, at best. But I was impressed by the clarity of the writing in the UNDP paper--it is so well organized that you get a macro-look at the paper just from the table of contents, and then a deeper look in the executive summary, all before you even read that actual body of the paper.
What are your thoughts--on either the writing of the paper, or issues raised therein?
-Neha
Potholes driving you crazy? Consider the possibilities of having corporate or higher education sponsors as well as citizens helping to fight the problem. This is an area of policy that is currently getting bad press lets transform this issue and get on the good news train.
ReplyDeleteThe number of potholes in Pittsburgh's streets is not only driving the Public Works crews crazy but also the citizens. In order to improve the efficiency of Pittsburgh's Department of Public Works both short term and long term policies need to be implemented.
The following bullets describe the status quo protocol for pothole remediation and our suggestions for improving them now and in the future. This will enable you to begin cutting costs and improving city streets immediately and result in savings for the City of Pittsburgh.
Status Quo:
• 311 hotline reporting system
• Public Work crew repair rotation crews
State-of-Art Technologies:
• Request approval from City Council to put out Request for Proposals to Consulting firms or Universities to advise on improving the pothole remediation process.
o Recommendations for Best Practices
o Cost-Benefit Analysis
o Collaboration with City Council
• Determine in there are feasible improvements to current remediation process.
Adopt-A-Pothole:
• Create a website to help map the number of potholes in City of Pittsburgh and progress towards repairing the streets (GIS).
• 311 Hotline: Include in protocol asking concerned citizens to donate to Adopt-A-Pothole or to participate in program.
• Advertise Adopt-A-Pothole program throughout the City of Pittsburgh to corporations and higher education institutions.
o Benchmark Example: KFC Re-Fresh America’s Pothole Stricken Roads
o Cost of filling potholes and logo.
The new blog is http://barringtheweather.blogspot.com and Professor Barr has the correct password to sign on to distribute tomorrow.
ReplyDeleteCathleen